Comments on: Unearthing the Lost Words of Jesus

By: Ed Jones

Ed Jones — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:21:18 +0000

To this point in time I have received no comment on my reconstruction of origins of the Jesus Tradition as named in my June 14 Comment – neither yea nor nay – even an acknowledgment that it has been read, Is there some explanation one might offer?

By: Ed Jones

Ed Jones — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:38:36 +0000

This is to cancel the last Comment – November 27, 2009. The essay, The Importance of the Historical Jesus – 6 Comments (now 10 Comments) has NOT been removed. I was mistaken. Apologies.

By: Ed Jones

Ed Jones — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:07:46 +0000

The Hoffmann essay: “The Importance of the Historical Jesus”, 6 Cmments, has been removed. To find the Hoffmann letter go to The Forbidden Gospels Blog, My Decision about the Jesus Project, Comments April 12 – April 17.

By: gospels.net » The Rediscovery of the Gospel of Thomas

gospels.net » The Rediscovery of the Gospel of Thomas — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:10:30 +0000

[...] Most accounts of the rediscovery of the Gospel of Thomas tend to begin with the dramatic story of the unearthing of the Nag Hammadi Library in 1945: an essentially complete Coptic translation of the text was contained in one of the thirteen codices brought to light by this find (as I mentioned previously, a good account of this discovery is: John Dart’s, Unearthing the Lost Words of Jesus). [...]

By: Ed Jones

Ed Jones — Sun, 13 Sep 2009 00:55:09 +0000

Correction to June 15 Comment.
April 14 should read June 14.

The June 14 Comment was submitted to read: Enter the blog: R. Joseph Hoffmann – Word Press.
It was published with R. Joseph Hoffmann – Word Press omitted. The June 15 Comment was to correct this omission.

Ed Jones

By: Ed Jones

Ed Jones — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:51:28 +0000

Ed Jones said,

To April 14 Comment I need to add – archive of essays – R. Joseph Hoffmann – wordpress.

By: Ed Jones

Ed Jones — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:36:25 +0000

Ed Jones said,

This is in the interest of “Uncovering the Lost Words of Jesus”.
On the “assumed” authority of Schubert M. Ogden, James M. Robinson and Hans Dieter Betz this is to name a reconstruction of origins based on “the oldest layer of tradition” (Robinson). The claim is made that this Scriptural source is our closest apostolic witness, constituting an alternative to the writings of the New Testament, none of which are apostolic.
This was written as a letter to R. Joseph Hoffmann as a contribution to the Jesus Project. Check it out – it may just prove to be of interest.

Enter the blog: .
The blog is an archive of Hoffmann essays. Scroll down 8 essays
to the one titled: “The Importance of the Historical Jesus – -”, highlight “6 Comments”. Ignore Comments 2,3,and 4, these relate to a reaction to a four day delay in posting Comment 1, which finally was posted after adding Comment 5, the final paragraph of the letter. Comment 6 is a related add-on.