<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update: Unearthing the Lost Words of Jesus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gospels.net/2009/06/update-unearthing-the-lost-words-of-jesus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gospels.net/2009/06/update-unearthing-the-lost-words-of-jesus/</link>
	<description>an online resource dedicated to the Gospel of Thomas and other early Christian Gospels</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:21:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Bernhard</title>
		<link>http://www.gospels.net/2009/06/update-unearthing-the-lost-words-of-jesus/comment-page-1/#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Bernhard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gospels.net/?p=948#comment-636</guid>
		<description>Posted on behalf of John Dart:

My last book, Decoding Mark (Trinity Press International, 2003 hardcover; Continuum 2006 paperback) proposes an early version of the Gospel of Mark that did not include the 70+-verse trip to Bethsaida (expanding on H. Koester&#039;s suggestion that an editor inserted this section, which is not found in Luke) but did include the two-part story of Jesus and a young &quot;beloved disciple&quot; (discovered by the late Morton Smith).  The controversy alleging a hoax by Smith erupted anew a few years ago but I and some credible scholars believe that this typically Markan story, which frames Mk 10:35-45, is a genuine part of Markan writing that became excised at some early point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted on behalf of John Dart:</p>
<p>My last book, Decoding Mark (Trinity Press International, 2003 hardcover; Continuum 2006 paperback) proposes an early version of the Gospel of Mark that did not include the 70+-verse trip to Bethsaida (expanding on H. Koester&#8217;s suggestion that an editor inserted this section, which is not found in Luke) but did include the two-part story of Jesus and a young &#8220;beloved disciple&#8221; (discovered by the late Morton Smith).  The controversy alleging a hoax by Smith erupted anew a few years ago but I and some credible scholars believe that this typically Markan story, which frames Mk 10:35-45, is a genuine part of Markan writing that became excised at some early point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
