Subject: Re: Thoughts of GosThom
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 13:44:40 -0700
From: Andrew Bernhard <cabern@teleport.com>
To: miser17@epix.net
CC: crosstalk@info.harpercollins.com

> I think there is more to it than that. The form-critical argument is
> certainly made, and seems to be conceded by dependence proponents
> so that the logical move they must make is to reject the whole idea
> of form-critical laws or tendencies, as Mark does.

Without going deep into detail (yet) can you list the arguments that you would make
for Thomas' independence (that is, Thomas not depending on the synoptics).

Thanks,
Andrew